- /*
- * @(#)Policy.java 1.94 04/06/28
- *
- * Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
- * SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
- */
-
-
- package java.security;
-
- import java.io.*;
- import java.lang.RuntimePermission;
- import java.net.MalformedURLException;
- import java.net.URL;
- import java.util.Enumeration;
- import java.util.Hashtable;
- import java.util.Vector;
- import java.util.StringTokenizer;
- import java.util.PropertyPermission;
-
- import java.lang.reflect.*;
-
- import java.util.WeakHashMap;
- import sun.security.util.Debug;
- import sun.security.util.SecurityConstants;
-
-
- /**
- * This is an abstract class for representing the system security
- * policy for a Java application environment (specifying
- * which permissions are available for code from various sources).
- * That is, the security policy is represented by a Policy subclass
- * providing an implementation of the abstract methods
- * in this Policy class.
- *
- * <p>There is only one Policy object in effect at any given time.
- *
- * <p>The source location for the policy information utilized by the
- * Policy object is up to the Policy implementation.
- * The policy configuration may be stored, for example, as a
- * flat ASCII file, as a serialized binary file of
- * the Policy class, or as a database.
- *
- * <p>The currently-installed Policy object can be obtained by
- * calling the <code>getPolicy</code> method, and it can be
- * changed by a call to the <code>setPolicy</code> method (by
- * code with permission to reset the Policy).
- *
- * <p>The <code>refresh</code> method causes the policy
- * object to refresh/reload its current configuration.
- *
- * <p>This is implementation-dependent. For example, if the policy
- * object stores its policy in configuration files, calling
- * <code>refresh</code> will cause it to re-read the configuration
- * policy files. The refreshed policy may not have an effect on classes
- * in a particular ProtectionDomain. This is dependent on the Policy
- * provider's implementation of the
- * {@link #implies(ProtectionDomain,Permission) implies}
- * method and the PermissionCollection caching strategy.
- *
- * <p>The default Policy implementation can be changed by setting the
- * value of the "policy.provider" security property (in the Java
- * security properties file) to the fully qualified name of
- * the desired Policy implementation class.
- * The Java security properties file is located in the file named
- * <JAVA_HOME>/lib/security/java.security, where <JAVA_HOME>
- * refers to the directory where the JDK was installed.
- *
- * @author Roland Schemers
- * @author Gary Ellison
- * @version 1.94, 06/28/04
- * @see java.security.CodeSource
- * @see java.security.PermissionCollection
- * @see java.security.SecureClassLoader
- */
-
- public abstract class Policy {
-
- /** the system-wide policy. */
- private static Policy policy; // package private for AccessControlContext
- private static final Debug debug = Debug.getInstance("policy");
-
- // Cache mapping ProtectionDomain to PermissionCollection
- private WeakHashMap pdMapping;
-
- /** package private for AccessControlContext */
- static boolean isSet()
- {
- return policy != null;
- }
-
- /**
- * Returns the installed Policy object. This value should not be cached,
- * as it may be changed by a call to <code>setPolicy</code>.
- * This method first calls
- * <code>SecurityManager.checkPermission</code> with a
- * <code>SecurityPermission("getPolicy")</code> permission
- * to ensure it's ok to get the Policy object..
- *
- * @return the installed Policy.
- *
- * @throws SecurityException
- * if a security manager exists and its
- * <code>checkPermission</code> method doesn't allow
- * getting the Policy object.
- *
- * @see SecurityManager#checkPermission(Permission)
- * @see #setPolicy(java.security.Policy)
- */
- public static Policy getPolicy()
- {
- SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
- if (sm != null)
- sm.checkPermission(SecurityConstants.GET_POLICY_PERMISSION);
- return getPolicyNoCheck();
- }
-
- /**
- * Returns the installed Policy object, skipping the security check.
- * Used by SecureClassLoader and getPolicy.
- *
- * @return the installed Policy.
- *
- */
- static synchronized Policy getPolicyNoCheck()
- {
- if (policy == null) {
- String policy_class = null;
- policy_class = (String)AccessController.doPrivileged(
- new PrivilegedAction() {
- public Object run() {
- return Security.getProperty("policy.provider");
- }
- });
- if (policy_class == null) {
- policy_class = "sun.security.provider.PolicyFile";
- }
-
- try {
- policy = (Policy)
- Class.forName(policy_class).newInstance();
- } catch (Exception e) {
- /*
- * The policy_class seems to be an extension
- * so we have to bootstrap loading it via a policy
- * provider that is on the bootclasspath
- * If it loads then shift gears to using the configured
- * provider.
- */
-
- // install the bootstrap provider to avoid recursion
- policy = new sun.security.provider.PolicyFile();
-
- final String pc = policy_class;
- Policy p = (Policy)
- AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
- public Object run() {
- try {
- ClassLoader cl =
- ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
- // we want the extension loader
- ClassLoader extcl = null;
- while (cl != null) {
- extcl = cl;
- cl = cl.getParent();
- }
- return (extcl != null? Class.forName
- (pc, true, extcl).newInstance():
- null);
- } catch (Exception e) {
- return null;
- }
- }
- });
- /*
- * if it loaded install it as the policy provider. Otherwise
- * continue to use the system default implementation
- */
- if (p != null)
- policy = p;
-
- if (p == null && debug != null) {
- debug.println("policy provider " +
- policy_class + " not available;using " +
- "sun.security.provider.PolicyFile");
- e.printStackTrace();
- }
- }
- }
- return policy;
- }
-
- /**
- * Sets the system-wide Policy object. This method first calls
- * <code>SecurityManager.checkPermission</code> with a
- * <code>SecurityPermission("setPolicy")</code>
- * permission to ensure it's ok to set the Policy.
- *
- * @param p the new system Policy object.
- *
- * @throws SecurityException
- * if a security manager exists and its
- * <code>checkPermission</code> method doesn't allow
- * setting the Policy.
- *
- * @see SecurityManager#checkPermission(Permission)
- * @see #getPolicy()
- *
- */
- public static void setPolicy(Policy p)
- {
- SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
- if (sm != null) sm.checkPermission(
- new SecurityPermission("setPolicy"));
- if (p != null) {
- initPolicy(p);
- }
- synchronized (Policy.class) {
- Policy.policy = p;
- }
- }
-
- /**
- * Initialize superclass state such that a legacy provider can
- * handle queries for itself.
- *
- * @since 1.4
- */
- private static void initPolicy (final Policy p) {
- /*
- * A policy provider not on the bootclasspath could trigger
- * security checks fulfilling a call to either Policy.implies
- * or Policy.getPermissions. If this does occur the provider
- * must be able to answer for it's own ProtectionDomain
- * without triggering additional security checks, otherwise
- * the policy implementation will end up in an infinite
- * recursion.
- *
- * To mitigate this, the provider can collect it's own
- * ProtectionDomain and associate a PermissionCollection while
- * it is being installed. The currently installed policy
- * provider (if there is one) will handle calls to
- * Policy.implies or Policy.getPermissions during this
- * process.
- *
- * This Policy superclass caches away the ProtectionDomain and
- * statically binds permissions so that legacy Policy
- * implementations will continue to function.
- */
-
- ProtectionDomain policyDomain = (ProtectionDomain)
- AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
- public Object run() {
- return p.getClass().getProtectionDomain();
- }
- });
-
- /*
- * Collect the permissions granted to this protection domain
- * so that the provider can be security checked while processing
- * calls to Policy.implies or Policy.getPermissions.
- */
- PermissionCollection policyPerms = null;
- synchronized (p) {
- if (p.pdMapping == null) {
- p.pdMapping = new WeakHashMap();
- }
- }
-
- if (policyDomain.getCodeSource() != null) {
- if (Policy.isSet()) {
- policyPerms = policy.getPermissions(policyDomain);
- }
-
- if (policyPerms == null) { // assume it has all
- policyPerms = new Permissions();
- policyPerms.add(SecurityConstants.ALL_PERMISSION);
- }
-
- synchronized (p.pdMapping) {
- // cache of pd to permissions
- p.pdMapping.put(policyDomain, policyPerms);
- }
- }
- return;
- }
-
- /**
- * Evaluates the global policy and returns a
- * PermissionCollection object specifying the set of
- * permissions allowed for code from the specified
- * code source.
- *
- * @param codesource the CodeSource associated with the caller.
- * This encapsulates the original location of the code (where the code
- * came from) and the public key(s) of its signer.
- *
- * @return the set of permissions allowed for code from <i>codesource</i>
- * according to the policy.The returned set of permissions must be
- * a new mutable instance and it must support heterogeneous
- * Permission types.
- *
- */
- public abstract PermissionCollection getPermissions(CodeSource codesource);
-
- /**
- * Evaluates the global policy and returns a
- * PermissionCollection object specifying the set of
- * permissions allowed given the characteristics of the
- * protection domain.
- *
- * @param domain the ProtectionDomain associated with the caller.
- *
- * @return the set of permissions allowed for the <i>domain</i>
- * according to the policy.The returned set of permissions must be
- * a new mutable instance and it must support heterogeneous
- * Permission types.
- *
- * @see java.security.ProtectionDomain
- * @see java.security.SecureClassLoader
- * @since 1.4
- */
- public PermissionCollection getPermissions(ProtectionDomain domain) {
- PermissionCollection pc = null;
-
- if (domain == null)
- return new Permissions();
-
- if (pdMapping == null) {
- initPolicy(this);
- }
-
- synchronized (pdMapping) {
- pc = (PermissionCollection)pdMapping.get(domain);
- }
-
- if (pc != null) {
- Permissions perms = new Permissions();
- synchronized (pc) {
- for (Enumeration e = pc.elements() ; e.hasMoreElements() ;) {
- perms.add((Permission)e.nextElement());
- }
- }
- return perms;
- }
-
- pc = getPermissions(domain.getCodeSource());
- if (pc == null) {
- pc = new Permissions();
- }
-
- addStaticPerms(pc, domain.getPermissions());
- return pc;
- }
-
- /**
- * add static permissions to provided permission collection
- */
- private void addStaticPerms(PermissionCollection perms,
- PermissionCollection statics) {
- if (statics != null) {
- synchronized (statics) {
- Enumeration e = statics.elements();
- while (e.hasMoreElements()) {
- perms.add((Permission)e.nextElement());
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
- /**
- * Evaluates the global policy for the permissions granted to
- * the ProtectionDomain and tests whether the permission is
- * granted.
- *
- * @param domain the ProtectionDomain to test
- * @param permission the Permission object to be tested for implication.
- *
- * @return true if "permission" is a proper subset of a permission
- * granted to this ProtectionDomain.
- *
- * @see java.security.ProtectionDomain
- * @since 1.4
- */
- public boolean implies(ProtectionDomain domain, Permission permission) {
- PermissionCollection pc;
-
- if (pdMapping == null) {
- initPolicy(this);
- }
-
- synchronized (pdMapping) {
- pc = (PermissionCollection)pdMapping.get(domain);
- }
-
- if (pc != null) {
- return pc.implies(permission);
- }
-
- pc = getPermissions(domain);
- if (pc == null) {
- return false;
- }
-
- synchronized (pdMapping) {
- // cache it
- pdMapping.put(domain, pc);
- }
-
- return pc.implies(permission);
- }
-
- /**
- * Refreshes/reloads the policy configuration. The behavior of this method
- * depends on the implementation. For example, calling <code>refresh</code>
- * on a file-based policy will cause the file to be re-read.
- *
- */
- public abstract void refresh();
- }